To use all functions of this page, please activate cookies in your browser.
With an accout for my.chemeurope.com you can always see everything at a glance – and you can configure your own website and individual newsletter.
- My watch list
- My saved searches
- My saved topics
- My newsletter
Italy considers the gasification challenge
14-05-2012: Delegates at the 11th European Gasification conference in Cagliari, Italy, are working against a backdrop of difficult political and economic challenges according to the conference chairman, Jacobs Engineering’s John Griffiths.
Griffiths used his opening remarks to highlight three key issues that are influencing the adoption of gasification technology as a conversion route to power, fuels and chemicals from a wide range of primary energy sources.
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) technology is well suited to the requirements of low carbon power generation but it demands capital expenditure for which there is no commercial return in the absence of a realistic carbon pricing regime. Uncertainties surrounding the politics of carbon emission targets in Europe and elsewhere are hampering progress, prompting Griffiths to ask, “Are we going to capture CO2 or aren’t we?”
Griffiths also contended that the rundown of conventional coal fired generation in the UK driven by the EU Large Combustion Plant Directive raised major questions around security of supply, particularly in the face of industrial disputes. Citing the 1984-85 UK miners’ strike as an example, Griffiths argued that the presence of seven months coal stocks at power stations proved instrumental in keeping the lights on: “You can’t store seven months supply of gas...The UK will be totally dependent of pipelines and LPG shipments...Can we afford to put coal behind us?”
The availability of government support to stimulate low carbon power generation projects, including those based on gasification, was also cited as an area of concern: “In the old days we built plant to make money. But today, the availability of public funds is a key factor and given the state of many government balance sheets this is not something that we can depend on. Dependency on subsidy is unsustainable. How will we fund projects that have difficulty in securing private investment?”
Contact / Request information
Request further information free of charge:
This is where you can add this news to your personal favourites
- 1Drew Industrial Division of Ashland Specialty Chemical Company purchases industrial water-treatment business of London-based Fernox
- 2Fluor Corporation's Henry Kister Honored by Chemical Engineering Magazine
- 3LG-DOW Polycarbonate Plant Starts Production in Korea to Effectively Meet Regional Needs
- 4Plurafac LF 303 - Plurafac LF 305: The new generation of low-foam surfactants
- 5Knoll AG: Pharma business sold for $6.9 billion:
- 6Caflon® surfactants from Univar as substitutes for banned nonylphenol ethoxylates
- 7Baytron P®– Gateway to a new generation of polymers
- 8Thermo Nicolet: New OMNIC® 6.0 Software Introduced
- 9Largest and most efficient BOPP line for Africa
- 10Allegra® Launched in Japan
- Croatian accession to the European Union brings new duties for companies
- Merck successfully completes the second REACH registration phase
- 2923 more chemicals registered by industry under REACH
- New ECETOC report offers guidance for the inclusion of non-extractable residues
- Europe’s environment now healthier – but new risks emerging
- Volcano pollution could lead to Parkinson’s misdiagnosis
- How do cold ions slide?
- Using DNA as a flame-retardant coating
- Sabo SpA appoints Biesterfeld Spezialchemie as distribution partner for HALS
- Azelis extends distribution agreement with IFF to market fragrances in 5 new Eastern European countries