My watch list  

Chromium(IV) oxide

Chromium(IV) oxide
IUPAC name Chromium(IV) oxide
Other names Chromium dioxide, Chromium oxide
CAS number 12018-01-8
Molecular formula CrO2
Molar mass 83.9948 g/mol
Appearance black magnetic solid
Density 4.9 g/cm³
Melting point

400°C (decomposes)

Solubility in water Insoluble
Main hazards carcinogenic, toxic
Related Compounds
Other anions CrO3, Cr2O3, Cr3O4, MnO2
Except where noted otherwise, data are given for
materials in their standard state
(at 25 °C, 100 kPa)

Infobox disclaimer and references

Chromium dioxide or chromium(IV) oxide is a synthetic magnetic substance once widely used in magnetic tape emulsion. With the increasing popularity of CDs and DVDs, the use of chromium(IV) oxide has declined. However, it is still used in data tape applications for enterprise-class storage systems. It is still considered today by many oxide and tape manufacturers to have been the most perfect magnetic recording particulate ever invented.

Acicular chromium dioxide was first synthesized in 1956 by Norman L. Cox, a chemist at E.I. DuPont, by decomposing chromium trioxide in the presence of water at a temperature of 900 °F. and a pressure of 30,000 lbf/in². The magnetic crystal that forms is a long, slender glass-like rod — perfect as a magnetic pigment for recording tape. When commercialized in the late 1960s as a recording medium, DuPont assigned it the tradename of Crolyn.

Additional recommended knowledge



The crystal's magnetic properties, derived from its ideal shape anisotropy which imparted high coercivity and remanent magnetization intensities, resulted in exceptional stability and efficiency for short wavelengths, and it almost immediately appeared in high performance audio tape used in the standard audio cassette for which treble response and tape hiss were always problems. Unlike the spongy looking ferric oxides used in common tape, the chromium dioxide crystals were perfectly formed and could be evenly and densely dispersed in a magnetic coating; and that led to unparalleled low noise in audio tapes. Chrome tapes did, however, require a new generation of audiocassette recorders equipped with a higher bias current capability (roughly 50% greater) than that used by iron oxide to properly magnetize the tape particles. Also introduced was a new playback equalization setting (70 microseconds) that traded some of the extended high-frequency response for lower noise resulting in a 4–5 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio over ferric-oxide audio tapes. These bias and EQ settings were later carried over to "chrome-equivalent" cobalt-modified tapes introduced in the mid 1970s by TDK, Maxell, and others. Later research significantly increased the coercivity of the particle by doping or adsorbing rare-earth elements such as iridium onto the crystal matrix or by improving the axial length-to-width ratios. The resulting product was potentially a competitor to metallic iron pigments but apparently achieved little market penetration.


Until manufacturers developed new ways to mill the oxide, the crystals could easily be broken in the manufacturing process, and this led to excessive print-through. Output from a tape could drop about 1 dB or so in a year's time. Although the decrease was uniform across the frequency range and noise also dropped the same amount, preserving the dynamic range, the decrease misaligned Dolby noise reduction decoders that were sensitive to level settings. The chrome coating was harder than competitive coatings, and that led to accusations of excessive head wear. Although the tape wore hard ferrite heads faster than oxide based tapes, it actually wore softer permalloy heads at a slower rate; and head wear was more a problem for permalloy heads than for ferrite heads. The head wear scare and licensing issues with DuPont kept chrome blank consumer chrome tapes at a great disadvantage versus the eventually more popular Type II tapes that used cobalt-modified iron oxide, but chrome was the tape of choice for the music industry's cassette releases. Because of its low Curie temperature, chrome tape lent itself to thermomagnetic high speed duplication of audio and video cassettes for pre-recorded product sales to the consumer and industrial markets.


DuPont licensed the product to Sony in Japan and BASF in Germany in the early 1970s for regional producion and distribution. Because Japanese competitors of Sony resented payment of licensing fees to it for use of the pigment, they developed cobalt-adsorbed (TDK: Avilyn) and cobalt ferrite (Epitaxial) "chrome equivalent" Type II audio cassettes and various videotape formats as substitutes. Add to that the problem that the production of CrO2 yielded toxic by-products of which Japanese manufacturers had great difficulty properly disposing. BASF eventually became the largest producer of both the chromium dioxide pigment and chrome tapes, basing its VHS & S-VHS video tape, audio cassettes, and 3480 data cartridges on this formulation. Dupont and BASF had also introduced chrome-cobalt "blended" oxide pigments which combined about 70% cobalt-modified iron oxide with 30% chrome oxide into a single coating, presumably to offer improved performance at lower costs than pure chrome. Many high grade VHS tapes also used much smaller amounts of chrome in their formulations because its magnetic properties combined with its cleaning effects on heads made it a better choice than aluminum oxide or other non-magnetic materials added to VHS tape to keep heads clean. Dupont discontinued its production of chromium dioxide particles in the 1990s. In addition to BASF, which no longer owns a tape manufacturing division, Bayer AG of Germany, Toda Kogyo and Sakai Chemical of Japan also do or can produce the magnetic particles for commercial applications.


    This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Chromium(IV)_oxide". A list of authors is available in Wikipedia.
    Your browser is not current. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 does not support some functions on Chemie.DE