My watch list
my.chemeurope.com  
Login  

KMS state



The statistical mechanics of quantum field theory (see thermal quantum field theory) at the inverse temperature β and chemical potential μ can be characterized by a condition called the KMS condition.

Preliminaries

The simplest case to study is that of a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, in which one does not encounter complications like phase transitions or spontaneous symmetry breaking. The density matrix of a thermal state is given by

\rho_{\beta,\mu}=\frac{e^{-\beta \left(H-\mu N\right)}}{Tr\left[ e^{-\beta \left(H-\mu N\right)} \right]}=\frac{e^{-\beta \left(H-\mu N\right)}}{Z(\beta,\mu)}

where H is the Hamiltonian operator and N is the particle number operator (or charge operator, if we wish to be more general) and

Z(\beta,\mu)\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  Tr\left[ e^{-\beta \left(H-\mu N\right)} \right]

is the partition function. We assume that N commutes with H, or in other words, that particle number is conserved.

In the Heisenberg picture, the density matrix does not change with time, but the operators are time-dependent. In particular, translating an operator A by τ into the future gives the operator

\alpha_\tau(A)\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  e^{iH\tau}A e^{-iH\tau}.

A combination of time translation with an internal symmetry "rotation" gives the more general

\alpha^{\mu}_{\tau}\ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\  e^{i\left(H-\mu N\right)\tau} A e^{-i\left(H-\mu N\right)\tau}

A bit of algebraic manipulation shows that the expected values

\langle\alpha^\mu_\tau(A)B\rangle_{\beta,\mu}=Tr\left[\rho \alpha^\mu_\tau(A)B\right]=Tr\left[\rho B \alpha^\mu_{\tau+i\beta}(A)\right] =\langle B\alpha^\mu_{\tau+i\beta}(A)\rangle_{\beta,\mu}

for any two operators A and B and any real τ (we are working with finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces after all). We used that fact that the density matrix commutes with any function of (H-μN) and that the trace is cyclic.

As hinted at earlier, with infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces, we run into a lot of problems like phase transitions, spontaneous symmetry breaking, operators which aren't trace class, divergent partition functions, etc..

The complex functions of z, \langle\alpha^\mu_z(A)B\rangle and \langle B\alpha^\mu_z(A)\rangle converge if 0 < \Im{z} < \beta if we make certain technical assumptions like the spectrum of H-μN is bounded from below and its density doesn't increase exponentially (see Hagedorn temperature). If the functions converge, then they have to be analytic within the 0 < \Im{z} < \beta strip as their derivatives,

\frac{d}{dz}\langle\alpha^\mu_z(A)B\rangle=i\langle\alpha^\mu_z\left(\left[H-\mu N,A\right]\right)B\rangle

and

\frac{d}{dz}\langle B\alpha^\mu_z(A)\rangle = i\langle B\alpha^\mu_z\left(\left[H-\mu N,A\right]\right)\rangle

exist.

However, we can still define a KMS state as any state satisfying

\langle \alpha^\mu_\tau(A)B\rangle=\langle B\alpha^\mu_{\tau+i\beta}(A)\rangle

with \langle\alpha^\mu_z(A)B\rangle and \langle B\alpha^\mu_z(A)\rangle being analytic functions of z within the strip 0 < \Im{z} < \beta.

\langle\alpha^\mu_\tau(A)B\rangle and \langle B\alpha^\mu_{\tau+i\beta}(A)\rangle are the boundary distribution values of the analytic functions in question.

This gives the right large volume, large particle number thermodynamic limit. If there is a phase transition or spontaneous symmetry breaking, the KMS state isn't unique.

The density matrix of a KMS state is related to unitary transformations involving time translations (or time translations and an internal symmetry transformation for nonzero chemical potentials) via the Tomita-Takesaki theory.

 
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "KMS_state". A list of authors is available in Wikipedia.
Your browser is not current. Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 does not support some functions on Chemie.DE