My watch list
my.chemeurope.com

Parts-per notation

“Parts-per” notation is used, especially in science and engineering, to denote relative proportions in measured quantities; particularly in high-ratio (low value) proportions at the parts-per-million (ppm), parts-per-billion (ppb), and parts-per-trillion (ppt) level. Since parts-per notations are quantity-per-quantity measures, they are known as dimensionless quantities; that is, they are pure numbers with no associated units of measurement.

Overview

Parts-per notation is often used in the measure of dilutions (concentrations) in chemistry; for instance, to measure the relative abundance of dissolved minerals or pollutants in water. The expression “1 ppm” means a given property exists at a relative proportion of one part per million parts examined, as would occur if a water-borne pollutant was present at a concentration of one-millionth of a gram per gram of sample solution.

Similarly, parts-per notation is used also in physics and engineering to express the value of various proportional phenomena. For instance, a special metal alloy might expand 1.2 micrometers per meter of length for every degree Celsius and this would be expressed as α = 1.2 ppm/°C. Parts-per notation is also employed to denote the change, stability, or uncertainty in measurements. For instance, the uncertainty of land-survey distance measurements when using a laser rangefinder might be 1 mm per km of distance; this could be expressed as an U = 1 ppm.

The above parts-per notations are all dimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement always cancel in expressions like “1 nanometer per meter” (1 nm/m = 1 nano = 1 × 10–9 = 1 ppb = 0.000000001 ) so the quotients are pure numbers with values less than 1.

Note that although the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (an international standards organization known also by its French-language initials “BIPM”) recognizes the use of parts-per notation, it is not formally part of the International System of Units (SI).[1] Consequently, according to IUPAP, “a continued source of annoyance to unit purists has been the continued use of percent, ppm, ppb, and ppt.”[2] Also, because the named numbers starting with a billion have different values in different countries, the BIPM suggests avoiding the use of “ppb” and “ppt” to prevent misunderstanding. Nevertheless, parts-per notation, particularly the expression “ppm”, remains widely used in technical disciplines because of its convenience in denoting dimensionless quantities. See Alternatives to parts-per notation, below.

Parts-per expressions

• Parts per hundred: Should be represented by the percent (%) symbol and denotes one part per 100 parts, one part in 10², and a value of 1 × 10–2. This is equivalent to one drop of water in 5 milliliters (one spoon-full) or one second of time in 1⅔ minutes.
• Parts per thousand: Should be spelled out in full and should avoid the use the “ppt” abbreviation, which is generally understood to represent “parts per trillion”. It may also be denoted by the permille (‰) symbol. Note however, that specific disciplines such as the analysis of ocean water salt concentration and educational exercises use the “ppt” abbreviation. “Parts per thousand” denotes one part per 1000 parts, one part in 10³, and a value of 1 × 10–3. This is equivalent to one drop of water in 50 milliliters, or one second of time in 16⅔ minutes.
• Parts per ten thousand: Is a unit known as the permyriad (symbol ‱). It is used almost exclusively in finance, where it is known as the basis point and is typically used to denote fractional changes in percentages. For instance, a change in an interest rate from 5.15% to 5.35% would be denoted as a change of 20 basis points or 20 ‱. Although rarely, if ever, used in science (ppm would instead be used), one permyriad has an unambiguous value of one part per 10,000 parts, one part in 104, and a value of 1 × 10–4. This is equivalent to one drop of water in 500 milliliters, or one second of time in approximately 2¾ hours.
• Parts per million (ppm): Denotes one part per 1,000,000 parts, one part in 106, and a value of 1 × 10–6. This is equivalent to one drop of water in 50 liters, or one second of time in approximately 11½ days.
• Parts per billion (ppb): Denotes one part per 1,000,000,000 parts, one part in 109, and a value of 1 × 10–9. This is equivalent to 50 drops of water in an Olympic-size swimming pool, or one second of time in approximately 31.7 years.
• Parts per trillion (ppt): Denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000 parts, one part in 1012, and a value of 1 × 10–12. This is equivalent to 1 drop of water in 20 Olympic-size swimming pools, or one second of time in approximately 31,700 years.
• Parts per quadrillion (ppq): Denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000,000 parts, one part in 1015, and a value of 1 × 10–15. This is equivalent to 1 drop of water in a cube of water measuring approximately 368 meters on a side (a cube about as tall as the roof of the Empire State Building), or one second of time in approximately 31.7 million years.[3]

Alternatives to parts-per notation

SI-compliant expressions

In the English language, named numbers have a consistent meaning only up to “million.” Starting with “billion,” there are two numbering conventions: the “long” and “short” scales, and “billion” can mean either 109 or 1012.

For most of the 19th and 20th centuries, the United Kingdom uniformly used the long scale, while the United States of America used the short scale, so that the two systems were often referred to as “British” and “American” usage respectively. Today, the UK uses the short scale exclusively in official and mass media usage and, although some long-scale usage still continues, the terms “British” and “American” no longer reflect usage. See also Long and short scales. Unfortunately, the long scale is dominant in many non-English-speaking areas, including continental Europe and Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America. See also Names of large numbers.

Although the BIPM recognizes the use of “parts per million” (ppm) to represent dimensionless quantities, it cautions that due to the above-mentioned language differences and also because “ppt” occasionally means “parts per thousand,” both “ppb” and “ppt” should be avoided to prevent misunderstanding.[1] Clearly, this admonition would also apply to “parts per quadrillion” (ppq) for the same language-based reason. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) takes a more stringent position, stating that “the language-dependent terms ‘part per million,’ ‘part per billion,’ and ‘part per trillion’ ... are not acceptable for use with the SI to express the values of quantities.”[4] Note however, that the NIST’s stated premiss for its position is only partially true; “million” has only one meaning in all languages. Note too, that although “percent” (%) is not formally part of the SI, both the BIPM and the ISO, take the position that “in mathematical expressions, the internationally recognized symbol % (percent) may be used with the SI to represent the number 0.01” for dimensionless quantities.[1][5]

Because parts-per notations have generally well-understood meanings in modern, English-speaking scientific circles, and because its use simplifies the expression of dimensionless quantities, parts-per notation remains widely used in technical disciplines today. Expressions that the BIPM does not explicitly recognize as being suitable for denoting dimensionless quantities with the SI are shown in maroon text in the chart below.

NOTATIONS FOR DIMENSIONLESS QUANTITIES
Measure SI
units
Named
parts-per ratio
Parts-per
abbreviation
or symbol
Scientific
notation
A strain of… 2 cm/m 2 parts per hundred     2% [6] 2 parts in 102
A sensitivity of… 2 mV/V 2 parts per thousand 2 ‰ 2 parts in 103
A sensitivity of… 0.2 mV/V 2 parts per ten thousand 2 ‱ 2 parts in 104
A sensitivity of… 2 µV/V 2 parts per million 2 ppm 2 parts in 106
A sensitivity of… 2 nV/V 2 parts per billion 2 ppb 2 parts in 109
A sensitivity of… 2 pV/V 2 parts per trillion 2 ppt 2 parts in 1012
A mass concentration of… 2 mg/kg 2 parts per million 2 ppm 2 parts in 106
A mass concentration of… 2 µg/kg 2 parts per billion 2 ppb 2 parts in 109
A mass concentration of… 2 ng/kg 2 parts per trillion 2 ppt 2 parts in 1012
A mass concentration of… 2 pg/kg 2 parts per quadrillion 2 ppq 2 parts in 1015
A stability of… 1 (µA/A)/min. 1 part per million per min. 1 ppm/min. 1 part in 106/min.
A change of… 10 nΩ/Ω 10 parts per billion 10 ppb 10 parts in 109
An uncertainty of… 30 µg/kg 30 parts per billion 30 ppb 30 parts in 109
A shift of… 1 nm/m 1 part per billion 1 ppb 1 part in 109
A strain of… 1 µm/m 1 part per million 1 ppm 1 part in 106
A temperature coefficient of… 0.3 (µHz/Hz)/°C 0.3 part per million per °C 0.3 ppm/°C 0.3 parts in 106/°C
A frequency change of… 0.35 × 10–9 ƒ 0.35 part per billion 0.35 ppb 0.35 parts in 109

Note that the notations in the “SI units” column above are all dimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement cancel in expressions like “1 nm/m” (1 nm/m = 1 nano = 1 × 10–9) so the quotients are pure numbers with values less than 1.

The uno

Because of the cumbersome nature of expressing certain dimensionless quantities per SI guidelines, the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) in 1999 proposed the adoption of the special name “uno” (symbol: U) to represent the number 1 in dimensionless quantities.[2] This symbol is not to be confused with the always-italicized symbol for the variable ‘uncertainty’ (symbol: U). This unit name uno and its symbol could be used in combination with the SI prefixes to express the values of dimensionless quantities which are much less—or even greater—than one. The following are the common parts-per notations in terms of the uno:

• 1 ppm = 1 microuno = 1 µU
• 1 ppb = 1 nanouno = 1 nU
• 1 ppt = 1 picouno = 1 pU

In 2004, a report to the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) stated that response to the proposal of the uno “had been almost entirely negative” and the principal proponent “recommended dropping the idea.”[7] To date, the uno has not been adopted by any standards organization and it appears unlikely it will ever become an officially sanctioned way to express high-ratio (low value), dimensionless quantities. The proposal was instructive, however, as to the perceived inadequacies of the current options for denoting dimensionless quantities.

Improper applications of parts-per notation

Parts-per notation may properly be used only to express true dimensionless quantities; that is, the units of measurement must cancel in expressions like “1 mg/kg” so that the quotients are pure numbers with values less than 1. Mixed-unit quantities such as “a radon concentration of 145 µCi/L” are not dimensionless quantities and may not be expressed using any form of parts-per notation, such as “145 ppm”. Other examples of measures that are not dimensionless quantities are as follows:

• Particulate matter in the air: 50 µg/m³  but not:  50 ppm
• A stepper motor/gear system that produces a motion of 1 µm/pulse  but not:  1 ppm
• Mercury vapor concentration in air: 0.6 ng/L  but not:  0.6 ppt

Note however, that it is not uncommon to express aqueous concentrations—particularly in drinking-water reports intended for the general public—using parts-per notation (2.1 ppm, 0.8 ppb, etc.) and further, for those reports to state that the notations denote milligrams per liter or micrograms per liter. Whereas “2.1 mg/L” is technically not a dimensionless quantity on the face of it, it is well understood in scientific circles that one liter of water has a mass of one kilogram and that “2.1 mg/kg” (2.1 ppm) is the true measure. The goal in all technical writing (including drinking-water reports for the general public) is to clearly communicate to the intended audience with minimal confusion. Drinking water is intuitively a volumetric quantity in the public’s mind so measures of contamination expressed on a per-liter basis are considered to be easier to grasp.

Convertibility to other units of measurement

Parts-per notations may be expressed in terms of any unit of the same measure. For instance, the coefficient of thermal expansion of a certain brass alloy, α = 18.7 ppm/°C, may be expressed as 18.7 (µm/m)/°C, or as 18.7 (µin/in)/°C; the numeric value representing a relative proportion doesn’t change with the adoption of a different unit of measure.[8] Similarly, a metering pump that injects a trace chemical into the main process line at the proportional flow rate Qp = 125 ppm, is doing so at a rate that may be expressed in a variety of volumetric units, including 125 µL/L, 125 µgal/gal, 125 µ(m³)/m³, etc.

 International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) International Organization for Standardization (|SO) International System of Units (SI) Long and short scales Mole fraction Names of large numbers National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Percentage (%) Permille (‰) Permyriad (‱) (Basis point) SI prefixes

References

1. ^ a b c BIPM: 5.3.7 Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one
2. ^ a b Report to the 1999 IUPAP General Assembly: Report on recent Committee activities on behalf of IUPAP by Brian W Petley September 1998
3. ^ Measurements at parts in 1015, though rather uncommon in analytic chemistry, are performed. Measurements of dioxin are routinely made at the sub-ppq level, as are various toxins that have hormone-like, biological effects. The U.S. EPA currently sets a hard limit of 30 ppq for dioxin in drinking water but once recommended a voluntary limit of 0.013 ppq. Also, radioactive contaminants in drinking water, which are quantified by measuring their radiation, are often reported in terms of ppq. The ability to chemically detect contaminants at this level is truly an impressive feat; 0.013 ppq is equivalent to the thickness of a sheet of paper versus a journey of 146,000 trips around the world.
4. ^ NIST: Rules and Style Conventions for Expressing Values of Quantities: 7.10.3 ppm, ppb, and ppt
5. ^ Quantities and units - Part 0: General principles, ISO 31-0:1992.
6. ^ Compliance with the SI regarding the percent symbol (%) is limited in this chart. According to the BIPM’s SI brochure: Subsection 5.3.3, Formatting the value of a quantity, a space is always used to separate the unit symbol from the numeric value. Notable exceptions are the unit symbols for degree, minute, and second for plane angle, °, ′, and ″ (e.g. a latitude of 47° 38′). However, according to 5.3.7 Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one, the exception does not apply to the “%” symbol; it states as follows: “When it [the percent symbol] is used, a space separates the number and the symbol %.” This practice has not been well adopted with regard to the % symbol, is contrary to Wikipedia’s Manual of Style, and is not observed here.
7. ^ Report of the 16th meeting (13–14 May 2004), by the Consultative Committee for Units, to the International Committee for Weights and Measures, of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (1.1 MB PDF, here).
8. ^ In the particular case of coefficient of thermal expansion, the change to inches (one of the U.S. customary units) is typically also accompanied by a change to degrees Fahrenheit. Since a Fahrenheit-sized interval of temperature is only 59 that of a Celsius-sized interval, the value is typically expressed as 10.4 (µin/in)/°F rather than 18.7 (µin/in)/°C.