My watch list

Home
Encyclopedia
Møller-Plesset_perturbation_theory

Møller-Plesset perturbation theory

Electronic structure methods

Tight binding

Hartree-Fock

Møller-Plesset perturbation theory

Configuration interaction

Coupled cluster

Multi-configurational self-consistent field

Density functional theory

Quantum chemistry composite methods

Quantum Monte Carlo

This box: view • talk • edit

Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP) is one of several quantum chemistry post-Hartree-Fock ab initio methods in the field of computational chemistry. It improves on the Hartree-Fock method by adding electron correlation effects by means of Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory (RS-PT), usually to second (MP2), third (MP3) or fourth (MP4) order. Its main idea was published as early as 1934.^[1]

Additional recommended knowledge

Daily Visual Balance Check

Weighing the right way

Recognize and detect the effects of electrostatic charges on your balance

1 Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory
2 Møller-Plesset perturbation
- 2.1 Original formulation
- 2.2 Alternative formulation
3 Use of Møller-Plesset perturbation methods
4 See also
5 References
6 Further reading

Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory

The MP-theory is a special application of RS-PT. In RS-PT one considers an unperturbed Hamiltonian operator $\hat{H}_{0}$ to which is added a small (often external) perturbation $\hat{V}$ :

$\hat{H} = \hat{H}_{0} + \lambda \hat V$ ,

where λ is an arbitrary real parameter. In MP-theory the zeroth-order wave function is an exact eigenfunction of the Fock operator, which thus serves as the unperturbed operator. The perturbation is the correlation potential.

In RS-PT the perturbed wave function and perturbed energy are expressed as a power series in λ:

$\Psi = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=0}^{n} \lambda^{i} \Psi^{(i)}$ ,

$E = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=0}^{n} \lambda^{i} E^{(i)}$ .

Substitution of these series into the time-independent Schrödinger equation gives a new equation: ( $n \to \infty$ )

$\left( \hat{H}_{0} + \lambda V \right) \left( \sum_{i=0}^{n} \lambda^{i} \Psi^{(i)} \right) = \left( \sum_{i=0}^{n} \lambda^{i} E^{(i)} \right) \left( \sum_{i=0}^{n} \lambda^{i} \Psi^{(i)} \right)$ .

Equating the factors of $λ k$ in this equation gives an kth-order perturbation equation, where k=0,1,2, ..., n.

Møller-Plesset perturbation

Original formulation

The MP-energy corrections are obtained from Rayleigh-Schrödinger (RS) perturbation theory with the perturbation (correlation potential):

$\hat{V}\equiv H-F- \langle\Phi_0|H-F|\Phi_0\rangle,$

where the normalized Slater determinant Φ₀ is the lowest eigenfunction of the Fock operator

$F\Phi_0 \equiv\left( \sum_{k=1}^{N} f(k)\right) \Phi_0 = 2\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N/2}\varepsilon_i\right)\Phi_0.$

Here N is the number of electrons of the molecule under consideration, H is the usual electronic Hamiltonian, $f (1)$ is the one-electron Fock operator, and ε_i is the orbital energy belonging to the doubly occupied spatial orbital φ_i. The shifted Fock operator

$\hat{H}_{0} \equiv F+\langle\Phi_0| H-F | \Phi_0 \rangle$

serves as the unperturbed (zeroth-order) operator.

The Slater determinant Φ₀ being an eigenfunction of F, it follows readily that

$F \Phi_0 - \langle \Phi_0| F | \Phi_0\rangle \Phi_0 = 0 \Longrightarrow \hat{H}_{0} \Phi_0 = \langle \Phi_0| H | \Phi_0\rangle \Phi_0,$

so that the zeroth-order energy is the expectation value of H with respect to Φ₀, i.e., the Hartree-Fock energy:

$E_{\mathrm{MP0}}\equiv E_{\mathrm{HF}} = \langle\Phi_0|H|\Phi_0\rangle.$

Since the first-order MP energy

$E_{\mathrm{MP1}} \equiv \langle\Phi_0|\hat{V}|\Phi_0\rangle = 0$

is obviously zero, the lowest-order MP correlation energy appears in second order. This result is the Møller-Plesset theorem:^[1] the correlation potential does not contribute in first-order to the exact electronic energy.

In order to obtain the MP2 formula for a closed-shell molecule, the second order RS-PT formula is written on basis of doubly-excited Slater determinants. (Singly-excited Slater determinants do not contribute because of the Brillouin theorem). After application of the Slater-Condon rules for the simplification of N-electron matrix elements with Slater determinants in bra and ket and integrating out spin, it becomes

$E_{\mathrm{MP2}} = \sum_{i,j,a,b} \langle\varphi_i(1)\varphi_j(2)|r_{12}^{-1}|\varphi_a(1)\varphi_b(2)\rangle$

$\times \frac{2\langle\varphi_a(1)\varphi_b(2)|r_{12}^{-1}|\varphi_i(1)\varphi_j(2)\rangle -\langle\varphi_a(1)\varphi_b(2)|r_{12}^{-1}|\varphi_j(1)\varphi_i(2)\rangle} {\varepsilon_i +\varepsilon_j-\varepsilon_a-\varepsilon_b},$

where φ_i and φ_j are canonical occupied orbitals and φ_a and φ_b are canonical virtual orbitals. The quantities ε_i, ε_j, ε_a, and ε_b are the corresponding orbital energies. Clearly, through second-order in the correlation potential, the total electronic energy is given by the Hartree-Fock energy plus second-order MP correction: E ≈ E_HF + E_MP2. The solution of the zeroth-order MP equation (which by definition is the Hartree-Fock equation) gives the Hartree-Fock energy. The first non-vanishing perturbation correction beyond the Hartree-Fock treatment is the second-order energy.

Alternative formulation

Equivalent expressions are obtained by a slightly different partitioning of the Hamiltonian, which results in a different division of energy terms over zeroth- and first-order contributions, while for second- and higher-order energy corrections the two partitionings give identical results. The formulation is commonly used by chemists, who are now large users of these methods.^[2] This difference is due to the fact, well-known in Hartree-Fock theory, that

$\langle \Phi_0 | H- F | \Phi_0 \rangle \ne 0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad E_{\mathrm{HF}} \ne 2 \sum_{i=1}^{N/2} \varepsilon_i.$

(The Hartree-Fock energy is not equal to the sum of occupied-orbital energies). In the alternative partitioning one defines,

$\hat{H}_0 \equiv F, \qquad \hat{V} \equiv H-F.$

Clearly in this partioning,

$E_{\mathrm{MP0}} = 2 \sum_{i=1}^{N/2} \varepsilon_i, \qquad E_{\mathrm{MP1}} = E_{\mathrm{HF}}- 2 \sum_{i=1}^{N/2} \varepsilon_i .$

Obviously, the Møller-Plesset theorem does not hold in the sense that E_MP1 ≠ 0. The solution of the zeroth-order MP equation is the sum of orbital energies. The zeroth plus first order correction yields the Hartree-Fock energy. As with the original formulation, the first non-vanishing perturbation correction beyond the Hartree-Fock treatment is the second-order energy. We reiterate that the second- and higher-order corrections are the same in both formulations.

Use of Møller-Plesset perturbation methods

Second (MP2), third (MP3), and fourth (MP4) order Møller-Plesset calculations are standard levels used in calculating small systems and are implemented in many computational chemistry codes. Higher level MP calculations, generally only MP5, are possible in some codes. However, they are rarely used because of their costs.

Systematic studies of MP perturbation theory have shown that it is not necessarily a convergent theory at high orders. The convergence properties can be slow, rapid, oscillatory, regular, highly erratic or simply non-existent, depending on the precise chemical system or basis set.^[3] Additionally, various important molecular properties calculated at MP3 and MP4 level are in no way better than their MP2 counterparts, even for small molecules.^[4]

For open shell molecules, MPn-theory can directly be applied only to unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference functions (since RHF states are not in general eigenvectors of the Fock operator). However, the resulting energies often suffer from severe spin contamination, leading to very wrong results. A much better alternative is to use one of the MP2-like methods based on restricted Hartree-Fock references.

These methods, Hartree-Fock, unrestricted Hartree-Fock and restricted Hartree-Fock use a single determinant wave function. Multi-configurational self-consistent field methods use several determinants and can be used for the unperturbed operator, although not in a unique way so many methods, such as Complete Active Space Perturbation Theory (CASPT2) have been developed.

References

^ ^a ^b Møller C., Plesset M.S. (1934). "Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems". Phys. Rev. 46: 618–622. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.46.618.
^ See all volumes in the "Further reading" section.
^ Leininger M.L., Allen W.D., Schaefer H.F., Sherrill C.D. (2000). "Is Moller-Plesset perturbation theory a convergent ab initio method?". J. Chem. Phys. 112 (21): 9213-9222.
^ Helgaker, Trygve; Poul Jorgensen and Jeppe Olsen (2000). Molecular Electronic Structure Theory. Wiley. ISBN 978-0471967552.

Møller-Plesset perturbation theory

Additional recommended knowledge

Daily Visual Balance Check

Weighing the right way

Recognize and detect the effects of electrostatic charges on your balance

Contents

Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory

Møller-Plesset perturbation

Original formulation

Alternative formulation

Use of Møller-Plesset perturbation methods

See also

References

Further reading

About chemeurope.com

About LUMITOS

Advertise with LUMITOS