To use all functions of this page, please activate cookies in your browser.
my.chemeurope.com
With an accout for my.chemeurope.com you can always see everything at a glance – and you can configure your own website and individual newsletter.
 My watch list
 My saved searches
 My saved topics
 My newsletter
Kaon
Additional recommended knowledge
Basic propertiesThe four kaons are :
It is clear from the quark model assignments that the kaons form two doublets of isospin; that is, they belong to the fundamental representation of SU(2) called the 2. One doublet of strangeness +1 contains the K^{+} and the K^{0}. The antiparticles form the other doublet.
Although the K^{0} and its antiparticle are usually produced via the strong force, they decay weakly. Thus, once created the two are better thought of as composites of two weak eigenstates which have vastly different lifetimes:
(See discussion of neutral kaon mixing below.) An experimental observation made in 1964 that Klongs rarely decay into two pions was the discovery of CP violation (see below). Main decay modes for K^{+}:
StrangenessThe discovery of hadrons with the internal quantum number "strangeness" marks the beginning of a most exciting epoch in particle physics that even now, fifty years later, has not yet found its conclusion ... by and large experiments have driven the development, and that major discoveries came unexpectedly or even against expectations expressed by theorists. — I.I. Bigi and A.I. Sanda, CP violation, (ISBN 0521443490) In 1947, G. D. Rochester and C. C. Butler published two cloud chamber photographs of cosmic rayinduced events, one showing what appeared to be a neutral particle decaying into two charged pions, and one which appeared to be a charged particle decaying into a charged pion and something neutral. The estimated mass of the new particles was very rough, about half a proton's mass. More examples of these "Vparticles" were slow in coming. The first breakthrough was obtained at Caltech, where a cloud chamber was taken up Mount Wilson, for greater cosmic ray exposure. In 1950, 30 charged and 4 neutral Vparticles were reported. Inspired by this, numerous mountaintop observations were made over the next several years, and by 1953, the following terminology was adopted: "Lmeson" meant muon or pion. "Kmeson" meant a particle intermediate in mass between the pion and nucleon. "Hyperon" meant any particle heavier than a nucleon. The decays were extremely slow; typical lifetimes are of the order of 10^{−10} seconds. However, production in pionproton reactions proceeds much faster, with a time scale of 10^{−23} seconds. The problem of this mismatch was solved by Abraham Pais who postulated the new quantum number called "strangeness" which is conserved in strong interactions but violated by the weak interactions. Strange particles appear copiously due to "associated production" of a strange and an antistrange particle together. It was soon shown that this could not be a multiplicative quantum number, because that would allow reactions which were never seen in the new cyclotrons which were commissioned in Brookhaven National Laboratory in 1953 and in the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory in 1955. Parity violation: the τθ puzzleTwo different decays were found for charged strange mesons:
Since the two final states have different parity it was thought that the initial states should also have different parities, and hence be two distinct particles. However, with increasingly precise measurements, there were found to be no difference between their masses and lifetimes, indicating that they are the same particle. This was known as the τθ puzzle. It was resolved only by the discovery of parity violation in weak interactions. Since the mesons decay through weak interactions, parity need not be conserved, and the two decays may be caused by the same particle, now called the K^{+}. CP violation in neutral meson oscillationsInitially it was thought that although parity was violated, CP (charge parity) symmetry was conserved. In order to understand the discovery of CP violation, it is necessary to understand the mixing of neutral kaons; this phenomenon does not require CP violation, but it is the context in which CP violation was first observed. Neutral kaon mixing
Since neutral kaons carry strangeness, they cannot be their own antiparticles. There must be then two different neutral kaons, differing by two units of strangeness. The question was then how to establish the presence of these two mesons. The solution used a phenomenon called neutral particle oscillations, by which these two kinds of mesons can turn from one into another through the weak interactions, which cause them to decay into pions (see the adjacent figure). These oscillations were first investigated by Murray GellMann and Abraham Pais together. They considered the CPinvariant time evolution of states with opposite strangeness. In matrix notation one can write where ψ is a quantum state of the system specified by the amplitudes of being in each of the two basis states (which are a and b at time t = 0). The diagonal elements (M) of the Hamiltonian are due to strong interaction physics which conserves strangeness. The two diagonal elements must be equal, since the particle and antiparticle have equal masses in the absence of the weak interactions. The offdiagonal elements, which mix opposite strangeness particles, are due to weak interactions; CP symmetry requires them to be real. The consequence of the matrix H being real is that the probabilities of the two states will forever oscillate back and forth. However, if any part of the matrix were imaginary, as is forbidden by CP symmetry, then part of the combination will diminish over time. The diminishing part can be either one component (a) or the other (b), or a mixture of the two. MixingThe eigenstates are obtained by diagonalizing this matrix. This gives new eigenvectors, which we can call K_{1} which is the sum of the two states of opposite strangeness, and K_{2}, which is the difference. The two are eigenstates of CP with opposite eigenvalues; K_{1} has CP = +1, and K_{2} has CP = 1 Since the twopion final state also has CP = +1, only the K_{1} can decay this way. The K_{2} must decay into three pions. Since the mass of K_{2} is just a little larger than the sum of the masses of three pions, this decay proceeds very slowly, about 600 times slower than the decay of K_{1} into two pions. These two different modes of decay were observed by Leon Lederman and his coworkers in 1956, establishing the existence of the two weak eigenstates (states with definite lifetimes under decays via the weak force) of the neutral kaons. These two weak eigenstates are called the K_{L} (Klong) and K_{S} (Kshort). CP symmetry, which was assumed at the time, implies that K_{S} = K_{1} and K_{L} = K_{2}. OscillationAn initially pure beam of K^{0} will turn into its antiparticle while propagating, which will turn back into the original particle, and so on. This is called particle oscillation. On observing the weak decay into leptons, it was found that a K^{0} always decayed into an electron, whereas the antiparticle decayed into the positron. The earlier analysis yielded a relation between the rate of electron and positron production from sources of pure K^{0} and its antiparticle . Analysis of the time dependence of this semileptonic decay showed the phenomenon of oscillation, and allowed the extraction of the mass splitting between the K_{S} and K_{L}. Since this is due to weak interactions it is very small, 10^{−15} times the mass of each state. RegenerationA beam of neutral kaons decays in flight so that the shortlived K_{S} disappears, leaving a beam of pure longlived K_{L}. If this beam is shot into matter, then the K^{0} and its antiparticle interact differently with the nuclei. The K^{0} undergoes quasielastic scattering with nucleons, whereas its antiparticle can create hyperons. Due to the different interactions of the two components, quantum coherence between the two particles is lost. The emerging beam then contains different linear superpositions of the K^{0} and . Such a superposition is a mixture of K_{L} and K_{S}; the K_{S} is regenerated by passing a neutral kaon beam through matter. Regeneration was observed by Oreste Piccioni and his collaborators at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Soon thereafter, Robert Adair and his coworkers reported excess K_{S} regeneration, thus opening a new chapter in this history. CP violationWhile trying to verify Adair's results, in 1964 James Cronin and Val Fitch of BNL found decays of K_{L} into two pions (CP = +1). As explained in an earlier section, this required the assumed initial and final states to have different values of CP, and hence immediately suggested CP violation. Alternative explanations such as nonlinear quantum mechanics and a new unobserved particle were soon ruled out, leaving CP violation as the only possibility. Cronin and Fitch received the Nobel Prize in Physics for this discovery in 1980. It turns out that although the K_{L} and K_{S} are weak eigenstates (because they have definite lifetimes for decay by way of the weak force), they are not quite CP eigenstates. Instead, for small ε (and up to normalization),
and similarly for K_{S}. Thus occasionally the K_{L} decays as a K_{1} with CP = +1, and likewise the K_{S} can decay with CP = −1. This is known as indirect CP violation, CP violation due to mixing of K^{0} and its antiparticle. There is also a direct CP violation effect, in which the CP violation occurs during the decay itself. Both are present, because both mixing and decay arise from the same interaction with the W boson and thus have CP violation predicted by the CKM matrix. See also
References and external links


This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Kaon". A list of authors is available in Wikipedia. 