Nature’s original bioplastic is food for animals

A new study provides unexpected insights into how biodegradable PHA plastics are broken down in nature

17-Aug-2026
Alexander Gruhl, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology

The gutless marine worm Olavius algarvensis (here next to some sand grains) is only about 2 centimetres long and has become so dependent on its bacterial symbionts for nutrition and waste recycling that it has lost both its digestive and excretory systems

Long be­fore hu­mans dis­covered bio­de­grad­able plastics, mi­croor­gan­isms had already in­ven­ted their own. Many bac­teria and ar­chaea pro­duce nat­ural bioplastics called poly­hy­droxyalkanoates (PHAs), stor­ing them in­side their cells as re­serves of car­bon and en­ergy.

Un­til now, sci­ent­ists thought that only mi­croor­gan­isms them­selves could break down these sub­stances. Re­search­ers at the Max Planck In­sti­tute for Mar­ine Mi­cro­bi­o­logy in Bre­men, Ger­many, have now over­turned that long-stand­ing as­sump­tion. In a study pub­lished in Nature Ecology & Evolution, they show that an­im­als ran­ging from mar­ine worms and star­fish to ter­restrial spe­cies in­clud­ing earth­worms have en­zymes cap­able of de­grad­ing mi­cro­bial PHAs. The find­ings re­veal a pre­vi­ously over­looked way in which mi­cro­bial car­bon can enter an­imal food webs.

The story began with an un­usual mar­ine worm called Olavius algarvensis. It has neither a mouth nor a gut. In­stead, it farms sym­bi­otic bac­teria be­neath its skin and di­gests them for food.“One of the worm’s bac­terial sym­bionts stores enorm­ous amounts of car­bon as PHA,” says cor­res­pond­ing au­thor Nicole Du­bilier, Dir­ector at the Max Planck In­sti­tute for Mar­ine Mi­cro­bi­o­logy. “We wondered whether the worm had evolved a way to ac­cess this rich en­ergy re­serve.”

The an­swer was: Yes. The re­search­ers dis­covered an en­zyme in the worm that breaks down mi­cro­bial PHAs into small mo­lecules an­im­als can use. High res­ol­u­tion im­ages fur­ther showed that the en­zyme is pro­duced ex­actly where the worm di­gests its sym­bionts. This sug­gests that the worm can ac­cess the PHA stored by its bac­terial part­ners.

The team then searched gen­omes across the an­imal king­dom and found re­lated en­zymes sur­pris­ingly of­ten – in more than 66 an­imal spe­cies rep­res­ent­ing nine dif­fer­ent phyla. Labor­at­ory ex­per­i­ments con­firmed that en­zymes from phylo­gen­et­ic­ally dis­tant an­im­als –in­clud­ing a sponge, an earth­worm and a spring­tail – also de­grade mi­cro­bial PHAs. “This was the real sur­prise,” says first au­thor Car­oline Zeidler from the Max Planck In­sti­tute for Mar­ine Mi­cro­bi­o­logy. “What star­ted as a dis­cov­ery in a single mar­ine worm turned out to be a wide­spread cap­ab­il­ity shared by an­im­als from very dif­fer­ent branches of the tree of life.”

Mi­cro­bial PHAs oc­cur nat­ur­ally in soils, sed­i­ments and aquatic en­vir­on­ments world­wide. They are pro­duced whenever mi­croor­gan­isms store ex­cess car­bon for later use and are among the few nat­ur­ally oc­cur­ring plastics that are com­pletely bio­de­grad­able. Be­cause PHAs are in­creas­ingly man­u­fac­tured as sus­tain­able al­tern­at­ives to con­ven­tional plastics, un­der­stand­ing how they are de­graded in nature has be­come an im­port­ant area of re­search.

The new find­ings by Du­bilier and her team sug­gest that an­im­als, to­gether with mi­croor­gan­isms, may con­trib­ute to the break­down of these nat­ural bioplastics. More fun­da­ment­ally, they re­veal that an­im­als can ex­ploit a mi­cro­bial car­bon re­serve that had pre­vi­ously been thought to be in­ac­cess­ible to them.

“Our study changes our un­der­stand­ing of who can use these mi­cro­bial car­bon stores,” says co-cor­res­pond­ing au­thor Mag­gie So­gin, who car­ried out much of the work at the Max Planck In­sti­tute for Mar­ine Mi­cro­bi­o­logy and is now As­sist­ant Pro­fessor at the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia, Merced. “An­im­als have prob­ably been feed­ing on nature’s ori­ginal bioplastic for hun­dreds of mil­lions of years – we’re only dis­cov­er­ing it now.”

The re­search­ers em­phas­ize that much re­mains to be learned about how wide­spread this pro­cess is in nature and how much it con­trib­utes to car­bon cyc­ling. Nev­er­the­less, the dis­cov­ery opens a new per­spect­ive on in­ter­ac­tions between mi­croor­gan­isms and an­im­als and high­lights how stud­ies of un­usual or­gan­isms can re­veal en­tirely un­ex­pec­ted bio­lo­gical pro­cesses.

Original publication

Other news from the department science

Most read news

More news from our other portals

Is artificial intelligence revolutionising chemistry?